Science and it's various exploits in the search for origins. Origins of life on earth, origins of the universe.
How much money is being spent on scientific exploration for the sake of exploration. If scientists had an end goal in their explorations that would shed some actual benefit to humanity that would be great.
We as a species seem to be nearing a precipice, a tipping point, an inflection point where we need to be studying things that will reign in runaway issues concerning our planet's ability to sustain us now and in the future.
I do not say that we need to develop a method of preventing global weather patterns or preventing volcanic activity and by extension earth quakes or other natural disasters. I dont believe those matters are actually achievable. Though there have been some wacky ideas put forth.
But the steps that we can make towards climatic issues where they pertain to acid rain and horrible air and water pollution seem gravely important. I do believe that we can get a grip on air and land and water pollution. Out of control wild fires are at some level avoidable. Baring the Idiot Fire Bug who wants to see his work on the TV.
Scientists make breakthrough in solving the mystery of life's origin
This article caused me to write on this topic today. What is the end goal of figuring out the origins of life? This help humanity how? Will 'The' scientist who finally nails down the origins of life on Planet Earth get some sort of Nobel prize? Will this discovery somehow advance drug discovery and manufacture? Will it help us in any measurable way? I do recall the same questions posed about the moon landing programs. The same with the Space Shuttle and the ISS. (International Space Station) and it's predecessor Skylab. I dont have the stats and specifics on that answer but there have been payoffs from those efforts. We all know about Velcro and Tang and freeze-dried ice cream.
But to what good end is the James Webb telescope and its predecessor the Hubble telescope. Cool we can now apparently see back in time to with in 280 million years after the Big Bang. That picture cost 10 Billion dollars. The Hubble cost 1.5 billion. Are we (the royal we) now going to spend 100 billion of the next super telescope? The Hubble got us back to 13.4 billion years ago. The next 100 billion dollar super-scope better take an 8 by 10 color glossy of God himself reaching out his hand towards us and I hope it's not him flipping us the high hard one.
Every week or so scientists declare that they have found yet another planet in the "Goldilocks" zone around some star some light-years from here. Currently the nearest is Proxima-b, 4.2 light-years away in the Proxima Centauri system. Now I do know that a light year, any light year is too far away for us to get excited about colonizing/destroying our next rental property. This quest to find a new apartment feels like Jeff Goldblum's Apartments.com. We know they are out there but they are in an entirely different solar system, in an entirely different galaxy. So not much good to us currently, or ever if my understanding of physics and approaching the speed of light is correct. We accelerate protons to 99.9999991% of the speed of light and that is 11 km/h (6.8 mph) short of the speed of light. That is 1 (one), A, Singular Proton. Not A person and not even an entire atom.
We go from looking back 280 million years ago to smashing particles looking for what? We at some point recently found the Higgs Boson. As I recall we called that the God particle. There is talk about the Cern creating a black hole somehow. Wont that be interesting when they create a black hole and it swallows up a great crater in the earth where Switzerland used to be. I dont know if black holes can get fill. I hope so. It would be a problem if it didn't leave a crater in the planed but a void in space where our solar system used to be. Its my understanding that black holes are the sorts things that involve themselves in the tradition of the Muckbang. I did read an article where the Cern Collider spontaneously shut down because something had happened that the operators of the collider didn't understand. Now in the age of AI generated nonsense this may and in all probability is a case of that nonsense. I got tricked by a YouTube story regarding the (I think) Google effort towards a quantum computer chip. Something about its spontaneously working on a problem of rearranging atoms in material allowing "It" to render matter mass less or something like that. It was late/early in the night/morning, so there is that. This may have been it or something like it.
Is this pursuit of the next smallest thing going to have follow on benefits for humanity? If there is some goal in finding the next smallest thing? Will it will allow us (the royal us) figure out reasonable fusion reactor power sources?